News

New InIIS research project

This project investigates the dynamics of knowledge production in the German fielf of peace and conflict research with respect to the military interventions in Afghanistan and Somalia. Specifically, it addresses the question if and how academic knowledge generated in this field makes it into security policy making of the federal government. These issues will be collaboratively analyzed together with Prof. Dr. Sophia Hoffmann (University of Erfurt) and Prof. Dr. Dirk Nabers and Dr. Frank Stengel (University of Kiel). Here at InIIS, Dr. Jude Kagoro and Prof. Dr. Klaus Schlichte will do the case study on Somalia/AMISOM. Starting in April 2022, the project will be funded for four years by the new BMBF program "Kompetenznetzwerke der Friedens- und Konfliktforschung."

<a href=Free-Photo from Pixabay" title="Free-Photo from Pixabay"/>Free-Photo from Pixabay
Virtual Author Workshop 8 and 9 July 2021

The Call as PDF

The foreign policy of Africa’s Great Lakes Region: Ideas, interconnections, and instruments

  • Virtual Author Workshop 8 and 9 July 2021, University of Bremen, Germany, organized by Dr. Jude Kagoro jude.kagoro@uni-bremen.de and Julian Friesinger julian.friesinger@uni-bremen.de

 

Yoweri Museveni has just been re-elected for another five-year term as Ugandan President. Ruling the East African nation since 1986, Museveni is now set to rule Uganda for four decades and presently is the 3rd longest serving president in Africa only behind Equatorial Guinea’s Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo and Cameroon’s Paul Biya. Across Uganda’s border to the South, Paul Kagame, Museveni’s former comrade-in-arms, has also established an environment that allows for the long-term rule of the rebel-turned-president in Rwanda. Kagame has been president for 20 years and in a de facto sense 26 years, since his Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) took power in 1994. Rwanda in many ways resembles Museveni’s Uganda. Crucial for consolidating Museveni’s long-term rule has been the militarization of politics and society which arguably also applies to the latter case of Rwanda.

The aspect of militarization has gained traction beyond the field of political sociology and the study of regime stability and found its way into foreign policy analysis. One important legacy of former rebel leaders and their movements has been the institutionalization of militarization and securitization at the regional level and the relations of these states, that is particularly evident in the case of the Great Lakes region, visible for example in the transformation of regional bodies such as the Intergovernmental Authority of Development (IGAD). This makes militarization a central aspect of the foreign policies of the countries in the Great Lakes region. The violent past and the resulting militarization is therefore bound to remain an influential determinant of the regional relations of East African states.

However, militarization or in this case military intervention has largely remained the last resort and is only one tool of foreign policy that governments dispose of. Diplomacy as the classical tool, but also trade have always played crucial roles in the foreign policy of states, also of East African nations. This is all the more evident when one also considers Kenya, Tanzania, and Burundi. The traditional instrument of diplomacy and alliance building as well as trade have played a crucial role here. Uganda’s elite has always fostered a pan-Africanist discourse and due to Museveni’s socialization in Nyerere’s Tanzania also retained close ties to Tanzanian and Kenyan elites. Economic integration has remained a central concern of the East African region since the rekindling of the once collapsed East African Community and is still a priority on the agenda of these states. Furthermore, the foreign policy of states has always been influenced by their domestic political sphere, the elites’ instincts of self-preservation and continued rule, but also by perceptions of a country’s population. China also plays an increasingly important role in the international system and therefore also has an impact on the foreign policy of the Great Lakes Region of Africa.

We take the renewed interest in the foreign policy of the Great Lakes Region as a starting point to inquire more broadly about the current state of the international relations of the area and seek to engage different scholars in that debate during an online workshop on 8 and 9 July 2021 that will be held within the framework of our research project “Figurations of Internationalized Rule in Africa” which is funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation).

Though not cast in stone and adjustments are expected, we intend to orient the workshop around three major themes: the micro-level of foreign policy, militarized foreign policy and global politics:

- The micro-level: How are the elite segments within bureaucracies and the foreign policy apparatus constituted, how and where were they socialized, and what image of foreign policy do they pursue? Do we see corresponding images among elites across nations or are these at odds with each other?

- The domestic/regional level: What role do militarized solutions play alongside the other instruments of foreign policy? What local perceptions and historical narratives drive the foreign policies of states in the Great Lakes region? What preference for instruments can we see in the wider region of East Africa?

- Interconnectedness between domestic and foreign policy: To what extent do authoritarian governments have to react to domestic policy pressures and how does the domestic sphere influence foreign policy?

- The interaction of the international system and foreign policy of the states of the Great Lakes region: Do we see an impact of the emerging multipolar international system on the foreign or domestic policy of the countries of the Great Lakes region or the area as a whole? How do African governments react to changing international relations?

We specifically invite contributions that either compare different states in the Great Lakes Region or look at the connection between the domestic sphere of politics and the foreign policy of countries (in-depth country study). Moreover, we are also interested in manuscripts that look at how countries in the region insert themselves into the international world order.

Please send a short abstract of no more than 500 words until 31 March 2021. Contributions for the workshop are chosen on a competitive basis.

We intend to discuss manuscripts related to the above questions during a two-day online workshop on 8 and 9 July 2021. We plan to publish the papers in an edited volume with an internationally renowned publishing house.

Contact

For any further questions, please contact us via:
Dr. Jude Kagoro jude.kagoro@uni-bremen.de
Julian Friesinger julian.friesinger@uni-bremen.de

President Museveri (right) congratulates Dr. Jude Kagoro.President Museveri (right) congratulates Dr. Jude Kagoro.
Award for services to police reform in Uganda

Dr. Jude Kagoro, research associate in the DFG-funded project "Policing Africa", which is being carried out under the project management of Prof. Klaus Schlichte at InIIS, received the Golden Jubilee Medal on 6 February 2018 from the Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni. The award is granted for Ugandan citizens for special and extraordinary achievements and is intended to honour Jude Kagoro's contributions to and support for reforms within the Ugandan police force. The laudatory speech says: "Dr. Jude Kagoro, despite his busy schedule at the University of Bremen in Germany, has dedicated time off to help in the establishment of the Police Senior Command and Staff College, guided research and tutored officers. Through his wide research on policing practices, he has not only helped in the development of Uganda Police Force but also contributed to ideology and doctrine. He has contributed enormously in several strategic meetings of the Ugandan Police, and his ideas have had a big impact.  He coordinated linkages with various international scholars and universities including the United Nations University for Peace, Costa Rica, which earned Uganda Police a mention during the United Nations General Assembly in 2017.”



Cover InIIS-ArbeitspapierCover InIIS-Arbeitspapier
Jude Kagoro: The Power Game. Organizational Politics, Intrigue and Machiavellianism in the Ugandan Police Force

Zum Arbeitspapier

Abstract

This article analyzes the complex web of the Uganda Police Force’s organizational politics configured in the relationships among individual police officers, operational structures, administrative hierarchy and sometimes stretching beyond the confines of the force. The organizational politics are characterized by different strands of relationships, but this article particularly concentrate on rivalry and intrigue, which seem opaque to “outsiders” or difficult to disentangle in detail if one is not looking at the police from “inside-out.” Based on a more than four-year ethnographic study of the police, in which the author has been immersed as both a researcher and a consultant, this paper highlights that police officers continuously foment informal alliances in their Machiavellian attempts to accumulate power, control of resources, authority, status and lucrative positions. The article does not pass judgement on the institution per say, but provides a better understanding of the internal workings of the same. It offers a magnifying glass perspective on a Ugandan interface bureaucracy not yet covered by the existing studies.

The article makes a four-dimensional scholarly contribution. First, it contributes to the existing literature on police research in Africa. Second, it broadens our perspectives on bureaucracies in general and interface bureaucracies in Africa in particular. Third, to our understanding of anthropology of state in Africa and ultimately, it contributes to the theory of organizational politics. The analysis in this article uncovers the social and cultural elements that reinforce or neutralize or frustrate state bureaucracies in their everyday exercise of duties and at the same time reveal how overarching and large scale state policies are interpreted, responded to and (re)produced in practical contexts. The insights in this paper helps us to better understand how the police works on a day-to-day basis, what influences promotions and deployments, the distribution of resources and above all comprehend the pressures, motivations and premises upon which officers make decisions.  

20 Jahre Institut für Interkulturelle und Internationale Beziehungen20 Jahre Institut für Interkulturelle und Internationale Beziehungen
Vortragsveranstaltung und Symposium anlässlich des 20jährigen Bestehens des Instituts für Interkulturelle und Internationale Studien

Vor 20 Jahren wurde das Institut für Interkulturelle und Internationale Studien (InIIS) an der Universität Bremen mit Unterstützung
des Senats der Freien Hansestadt Bremen gegründet.
Die damalige Idee, die beiden politikwissenschaftlichen Teildisziplinen der Internationalen Beziehungen und der Politischen
Theorie in einem Institut zusammenzuführen, hat sich als weitsichtig erwiesen. Die Forschungsthemen
und -ansätze des Instituts haben bis heute nichts von ihrer Bedeutung eingebüßt.
Gegründet von den Professoren Dr. Bernhard Peters, Dr. Dr. h.c. Dieter Senghaas und Dr. Michael Zürn hat das InIIS in den letzten
20 Jahren maßgeblich dazu beigetragen, dass die Politikwissenschaft heute zu den führenden Disziplinen an der Universität
Bremen gehört.

Das Programm können Sie hier als PDF herunterladen.

 

 

 

Politics, Military and Society Interpretation

Cover: Jude Kagoro's Militarization in UgandaJude Kagoro
Militarization in Post-1986 Uganda
Politics, Military and Society Interpretation
Reihe: Beiträge zur Afrikaforschung
Bd. 58, 2015, 296 S., 34.90 EUR, 34.90 CHF, br., ISBN 978-3-643-90541-3

 

This book discusses the phenomenon of militarization in post-1986 Uganda. It takes a holistic approach to connect different facets of militarization: the social and political; the macro and micro levels; the disguised and explicit forms. On one hand, the author illustrates that the military remains a crucial factor of political processes while on the other showing how military ethos such as uniform and training are a source of symbolic capital in both politics and social spheres. Ultimately, the book shows that militarization is a bi-directional process - macro politics facilitating it from above, while social forces such as ordinary people, media, and musicians reproduce it from below.